日本精品在线一区,天堂久久一区二区,国产精品久久久久久久久久不蜜月,午夜久久久久久久久久一区二区,久久免费99精品久久久久久,久久久久久1,久久久久久久久久网站

資訊|論壇|病例

搜索

首頁(yè) 醫(yī)學(xué)論壇 專業(yè)文章 醫(yī)學(xué)進(jìn)展 簽約作者 病例中心 快問診所 愛醫(yī)培訓(xùn) 醫(yī)學(xué)考試 在線題庫(kù) 醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)議

您所在的位置:首頁(yè) > 內(nèi)分泌科醫(yī)學(xué)進(jìn)展 > EDTA螯合劑或降伴糖尿病心梗心血管事件風(fēng)險(xiǎn)

EDTA螯合劑或降伴糖尿病心梗心血管事件風(fēng)險(xiǎn)

2013-11-29 10:07 閱讀:1450 來源:醫(yī)學(xué)論壇 作者:江* 責(zé)任編輯:江帆
[導(dǎo)讀] AHA2013年會(huì)公布的美國(guó)一項(xiàng)研究表明,在年齡大于50歲且伴有糖尿病的心肌梗死后患者中,EDTA螯合劑治療可顯著減少心血管事件。但該研究并未充分證明對(duì)所有的伴糖尿病心梗后患者常規(guī)用螯合療法。論文11月19日在線發(fā)表于《循環(huán)》。

  AHA2013年會(huì)公布的美國(guó)一項(xiàng)研究表明,在年齡大于50歲且伴有糖尿病的心肌梗死后患者中,EDTA螯合劑治療可顯著減少心血管事件。但該研究并未充分證明對(duì)所有的伴糖尿病心梗后患者常規(guī)用螯合療法。論文11月19日在線發(fā)表于《循環(huán)》。

  此項(xiàng)TACT研究以年齡≥50歲且既往伴有心肌梗死的患者為受試者,共633例糖尿病患者,被隨機(jī)分為EDTA螯合劑組(322例)或安慰劑組(311例)。主要終點(diǎn)為死亡、心梗再發(fā)、卒中、冠脈血運(yùn)重建或心絞痛住院;次要終點(diǎn)為心血管死亡、心梗再發(fā)或卒中。

  結(jié)果顯示,在633例(37%)糖尿病患者中,EDTA組的5年主要終點(diǎn)發(fā)生率顯著降低(25%對(duì)38%;危險(xiǎn)比[HR] 0.59)。對(duì)多亞組實(shí)施Bonferroni校正之后上述結(jié)果依然具有顯著性(校正P=0.002)。EDTA組的全因死昂率和次要終點(diǎn)發(fā)生率均顯著降低,但對(duì)多亞組進(jìn)行校正之后顯著性消失。減少1項(xiàng)主要終點(diǎn)的需治療數(shù)為6.5。在1075例非糖尿病患者中相關(guān)事件則無減少。

  原文閱讀:

     The Effect of an EDTA-based Chelation Regimen on Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Prior Myocardial Infarction in the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT)

  Abstract

  Background—The Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) showed clinical benefit of an EDTA-based infusion regimen in patients aged ≥50 years with prior myocardial infarction. Diabetes mellitus before enrollment was a prespecified subgroup.

  Methods and Results—Patients received 40 infusions of EDTA chelation or placebo. A total of 633 (37%) patients had diabetes mellitus (322 EDTA and 311 placebo)。 EDTA reduced the primary end point (death, reinfarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for angina; 25% versus 38%; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44–0.79; P<0.001) for over 5 years. The result remained significant after Bonferroni adjustment for multiple subgroups (99.4% CI, 0.39–0.88; adjusted P=0.002)。 All-cause mortality was reduced by EDTA chelation (10% versus 16%; hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36–0.88; P=0.011), as was the secondary end point (cardiovascular death, reinfarction, or stroke; 11% versus 17%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39–0.91; P=0.017)。 However, after adjusting for multiple subgroups, those results were no longer significant. The number needed to treat to reduce 1 primary end point over 5 years was 6.5 (95% CI, 4.4–12.7)。There was no reduction in events in non–diabetes mellitus (n=1075; P=0.877), resulting in a treatment by diabetes mellitus interaction (P=0.004)。

  Conclusions—Post–myocardial infarction patients with diabetes mellitus aged ≥50 demonstrated a marked reduction in cardiovascular events with EDTA chelation. These findings support efforts to replicate these findings and define the mechanisms of benefit. However, they do not constitute sufficient evidence to indicate the routine use of chelation therapy for all post–myocardial infarction patients with diabetes mellitus.


分享到:
  版權(quán)聲明:

  本站所注明來源為"愛愛醫(yī)"的文章,版權(quán)歸作者與本站共同所有,非經(jīng)授權(quán)不得轉(zhuǎn)載。

  本站所有轉(zhuǎn)載文章系出于傳遞更多信息之目的,且明確注明來源和作者,不希望被轉(zhuǎn)載的媒體或個(gè)人可與我們

  聯(lián)系z(mì)lzs@120.net,我們將立即進(jìn)行刪除處理

意見反饋 關(guān)于我們 隱私保護(hù) 版權(quán)聲明 友情鏈接 聯(lián)系我們

Copyright 2002-2025 Iiyi.Com All Rights Reserved

化隆| 当阳市| 循化| 乌鲁木齐县| 延安市| 昌乐县| 六安市| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 乌兰察布市| 安西县| 鄯善县| 绍兴县| 井冈山市| 安陆市| 射阳县| 虞城县| 德安县| 扎兰屯市| 庆云县| 虹口区| 黄龙县| 大竹县| 类乌齐县| 厦门市| 威宁| 铅山县| 太湖县| 普陀区| 台南市| 牟定县| 漳平市| 慈利县| 太仆寺旗| 靖西县| 霍州市| 车险| 高州市| 开鲁县| 盐边县| 塔城市| 丰县|